Thursday, February 4, 2010

I wrote this article for another blog in June of 2009, and I republish this as a precursor for some posts coming in the near future:

"Revisiting Self-Sufficiency"

I try to approach this in a very practical way, and to report back that way, too.

So... if you really want to be "self-sufficient"...


Well, you can't be 100% self-sufficient, and you don't need to be. Youcan produce most of your own, food, but not all of it, and you don't need to - and you can do it and still have a life and a job.

The first misconception is that you can garden your way to self-sufficiency... egh! wrong, thanks for playing! You can grow most of your own vegetables - growing spinich, brocolli, peppers, lettuce, tomatoes, potatoes, kale, carrots, etc... sufficient for a family of 4 or 5 is no big deal (preserving it all IS a big deal). Of course, if you tried to subsist off just this you would be dead or pretty sickly pretty soon (if you either have to earn money or farm full time that is... I guess sedentary couch potatoes could get by with just veggies, though their teeth and bones would certainly miss dairy in their diet). That produce is easy for a kitchen garden to produce.

Corn, potatoes, and beans in sufficient quantities to sustain your family is going to take a bit more work. Actually, a lot more, but still doable.

I get nasty emails from vegetarians on a semi regular basis lately. I always point out to them that they kill more animals with their consumption of fossil fuels than I do by feeding my family, but never mind hard facts - we are talking sensitivities here.

You see, I am a card carrying member of PETA... no not that PETA, the other one: People Eating Tasty Animals (and their milk and eggs, and using their manure for fertilizer). Animal protein is an absolute necessity in agrarian cultures with little fossil fuel inputs (try getting Omega-3 in your diet without animal fat), and as I TRY to do everything with as little fossil fuel input as possible (just look at my pictures... does it look like I cut the grass very often? NAFC.) they are necessay here, as well.

(I wonder if vegetarians consider the road kill from truck and trains carrying their grains and vegetables to them, or killed by climate change and pollution caused by operating farm and transport equiment, producing chemical fertilizers, pesticides used on the crops (bugs are animals, too), animals killed by farm equipment (rabbits, birds, snakes, toads, etc... call those fields home), I could go on and on but a "true beleiver" Vegan would not have read it anyway. Am I the only one to notice that, well, let me rephrase... I have NEVER met a vegan that was not pro-abortion. How's that for being STUNNINGLY full of sh*t?)

If you were looking for politically correct self sufficiency, you came to the wrong blog.

But I digress...

Organic Farms need animals for fertilizer and food - simple like that. Not want, should-have-if-possible, or ONLY for the manure (what would you do with all of the excess bulls, billy goats, roosters, and Boar hogs? They would quickly destroy your home and fields, eat every blade of grass, and injure and kill your children (think I exagerate? Leave your children in a field with a bunch of Bulls and Boar Hogs for an afternoon, let me know what you find when you come back), etc...

Let me repeat: Organic farming means animals for traction, for food, and for fertilizer. No animals, no organic farming - and no organic farming means continued factory farming and long distance food transportation, and that means climate change, pollution, etc...

It takes time, effort, and practice to be self-sufficent. You cannot learn it on the web. You could still be a doctor, lawyer, or indian chief - whatever it is you do for a living - and still produce most of your own food at home (if you live in the country or the burbs, that is). You don't need a lawn whatsoever. Every inch around your home can grow something edible. Fruit trees and berry bushes instead of ornamentals. Grapes instead of fences or hedges. Raised beds instead of a front yard. Housing 20 chickens and 2 dairy goats instead of a dog and a cat will give you eggs and milk rather than hookworm and dirty kitty litter, and the chickens and goats have a much better carbon foot print... it ain't even close. (I have a dog and barn cats... but they are working animals).

You would have to have the cooperation of your wife - good luck - and your family. Why do I say "wife" and not "spouse"? Because, there will be damn few single women, or men, moving to the country to start a self sufficient homestead, and even fewer single mothers. Nope, the demographics say it will be married people with children, with Dad providing and mom feeding the family and raising and educating the children - who'd a thunk it?! (Nothing is absolute. We have some lovely gay women neighbors (they describe themselves as "bull dykes" among other things... I love people that can laugh at themselves) running a self sufficient farm, and they are a hoot!)


So why'd I say "good luck"? I live half the year in Boca Raton, FL, where the poor people have a million dollar net worth, and the rich quite a bit more than that, and I should know - I manage their money! I hear their concerns like a priest in the confessional. Any of those guys even TRYS to move his family to a small holding homestead or ditch the landscaping for a productive garden, or try's to downsize the familY'y consumption... and it is off to divorce court for his troubles (I truly wish the "Real" American Housewife were more like Sharon Astyk but that that just ain't the case - America is fascinated by the Reality Show "The Real Housewives of Wherever" precisely because it is, in fact, REALITY). Sorry, but "family law" has left the successful "king of his castle" nothing more than a neutered figurehead, a laboring eunich that, if he so much as steps out of line, will lose his home and life's savings in addition to the family jewels he lost to the marriage/divorce industrial complex by marrying without a prenup agreement. What is the point of marriage in a society that promotes divorce?

(I am sure to get some winning emails and comments with that. Funny thing about the "truth", it gets people's piss hot. If I were to speak untruths, no one would care because we all know they simply were not true.)

There is good news, though. The Great Recession AND Peak Oil, in addition to making people poorer and requiring them to be more self sufficient, is going to demolish the marriage/divorce industrial complex. People (men - I mean, come on, have you ever heard of "GROOM" Magazine?) are already:

  1. Putting off marriage

  2. Not getting married, ever (over 40% of American children are born out of wedlock)

  3. Those that do marry are Engaging a pre-nuptual agreement more often to level the playing field

These were the unintended consequences (along with our SKY HIGH divorce rate and destroyed families) of Gloria Steinem, et al, and their Feminist revolution (one whose putative benefits went to 30 to 50 year old women AND THEN SPLIT WITH THEIR LAWYERS at the direct expense of 0 to 20 year old women (girls) and men (boys). The Great Recession is going to remove the incentive to divorce that was an unintended consequence in the 1960's and 1970's revisions of family law here in the U.S. People are going to NEED their family in a world without Medicare, Social Security, and Food Stamps.

Back to Organic Farming... So what does the previous couple of paragraphs diatribe have to do with Small Holding, Homestead, Organic Farming, whatever...?

There was a reason they were called "Family Farms"!!! Family, as in a husband and wife and their children. Not that that is necessarily what a family has to look like, but it was themost successful model for the building blocks of "community" for Millenia prior to the industrial age.

In an agrarian society do you know what women without husbands DO FOR A LIVING?? I'll give you 2 1/2 guesses, and a hint: It is one of the oldest, if not the oldest, professions around. If Peak Oil means we are going back to an agrarian system and the collapse of industrial society - why is it verbotten to discuss ALL likely outcomes.

Don't like the political commentary with your victory gardens and dairy goats? My apologies, but it was politics that got us into the mess we are in, politics that writes the nation's laws (including family law) and it is the analysis of those political errors that might lead the way out of it. Besides, this is my blog.

Yours for a better world (by starving out divorce lawyers)

libertariananimal at gmail (d0t) com

18 comments:

DaShui said...

Don't forget the traditional Asian "3 generations under one roof." Grandparents watching the grandchildren while the middle generation works. I think this will make a comeback as pensions,social security, medicare, equities, house prices, all collapse, and nobody can afford a retirement home anymore.

kathy said...

I think this was one of the first post I read here and the reason I faithfully come back. You are right of course. We do raise a lot of what we eat (not all until I get to growing grains and the nut trees mature) and the hardest part is not just the preservation but the preparation. Cooking from scratch takes time and planning and can not easily be done by someone who is also working 40 hours a week. We are making plans for number three son to come home after college as he won't be able to get a job anyway and it will take three generations to keep this place going.

Anonymous said...

And so it was in the US until 1950.

Regards,

Coal Guy

bureaucrat said...

*yawn* Let me know when we're back to talking about energy. Considering how the peak oil movement TOTALLY AND COMPLETELY IGNORED the DEMAND (macroeconomic) side of the equation (and I've been reading peak oil stuff since early '06), I would think there would be lots to talk about. For one thing, it is a hell of a lot easier to tolerate peak oil if you are starting to use/need less oil in the first place, whether or not by choice. :)

bureaucrat said...

P.S. nothing is going to collapse, and you better hope "it" doesn't, cause you nerds who read and write on blogs are going to be the first ones sacrificed. :)

A Quaker in a Strange Land said...

Hey Kathy and DaShui:

My wife is from Asia, and she and my mother get on splendidly because of the cultural norm you speak of... my mom comes over EVERY night (she lives 2 miles away and is 86 years old!) to have dinner with us, but more importantly to help with kid baths, and dinner, and dishes... and let me tell you how thankful we are to have her so close to us and to be as helpful as she is! She will also spend most of the Spring and Summer with us on the farm.

to Kathy's point about cooking from scratch...

I truly appreciate my wife's contributions and sacrifices made staying home and caring for the lot of us. We sit down every night at the same time to a delicious family meal TOGETHER - its the best. That get's back to the benefits of family... my wife appreciates my efforts, too... because both of us consider the family first in everything we do.

No one household can be "self-sufficient". Perhaps nor even a local community. The point is not perfection, nor isolation. It is merely a way of life that has big time benefits for our/the family to have some level of connection to the land/community/neighbors.

Bur:

There is nothing to report in energy. Deflation is ruling the roost at the moment. Still, it matters little that its a chicken or an egg which comes first... somebody is coming...

A Quaker in a Strange Land said...

I have traveled VERY extensively in third world countries - by foot (flying to the Domincan Republic and staying at a 4 star resort is NOT what I am talking about) - these are places that never SAW the industrial revolution. Their social structures look to have some things in common - FAMILY. Ma, Pa, Gramps, Kids... and then CLAN: Aunts, Uncles, Cousins, In-Laws...

THey look nothing like what has happened in the coastal U.S. states...

My bet is we go their way, not the other way around...

Anonymous said...

Note to bureaucrat

The collapse already happened in Fall of 2008....with casualty count still in progress.

PioneerPreppy said...

What a great post!!!

Peak Oil, Massive debt whatever it is that causes this abomination of a society, hyjacked by feminist and progressives, to fall apart will happen because frankly men do not care anymore.

Men could fix this, men who built the world could put it all back together again but not under the oppression these feminist have placed us under.

You quite rightly mention men not marrying and such, but fail to mention men are withdrawing from society. Those with morals and empathy and sense have pulled back and now the criminal politicians and rabid progressive feminist rule.

Entitlements and nanny states will fall either under their own weight or by peak oil... It will happen.

A Quaker in a Strange Land said...

Pioneer:

FAMILIES will put this back together again. I have high hopes for my sons and my daughter to be good people, good fathers and mothers when their time comes.

I'm a Libertarian. I don't care what you smoke or who you sleep with - I just want you to take responsibility for your own actions.

I don't even care who you dislike, provided you do them no harm.

Much of the silliness on ALL sides has been discounted and rejected by thinking people. I sincerely hope that good folks are not withdrawing from society.

PioneerPreppy said...

Greg

As you pointed out with everything stacked against them families don't have a chance currently.

I would agree with you that if it all came apart that families would once again become the most important institution and rightly so!!

Yet men would have to resume their traditional roles as would women.

So what I am saying is that even today if we could stand up and take these traditional roles we could fix this... But that will not happen.

As for taking responsibillity well thats the crux isn't it? Everything done to date, all these entitlements, the bias of the courts, the nanny state everything is set so feminist do not HAVE to actually take responsibillity. All the blame is on men and men are the ones to pay.

Finally pulling away from marriage is in fact withdrawing from society. So yes it is happening all the time some pull back further than others.

I am not a Libertarian but I don't care what anyone smokes or drinks or sleeps with either (well except for children) but I don't want to pay for them to do it or have to be penalized for my gender, race, or religion while others are given bonuses for their's.

bureaucrat said...

There was no collapse in 2008. There was, however, an asset bubble, as there has been every 75 years or so for the last 500 years of human history. It never fails. You give the monkeys lots of available dollars (or whatever currency) at super-cheap interest rates, and we're all surprised when the monkeys take the money and start spending it, which inflates prices as everyone rushes to buy the "next big thing" (houses, cars, commodities, you name it.) Oil prices surged in 2008 because a lot of traders bidded up the price as they thought it was the "investment of the century." Oil prices didn't increase cause of supply and demand. They increased cause of speculation. They dropped just as fast because of speculation (all the money used to push up the oil prices was, of course, borrowed). The world is doing just fine. The supermarkets are full and the gas stations are all open and full. As long as those two businesses are up and running, we live as we have.

Anonymous said...

Bur,

You arrogance is astounding. Just because you have a secure spot at the Federal teat (for now) does not give you the right discount the suffering of those whose lives have been thoroughly destroyed by this collapse. Everything is NOT OK. Just because you have been personally unaffected, don't be callous to the suffering of others. Tens of millions of people are out of work. Many have lost their houses and have children to feed.

Insufficient supply in 2007 and 2008 pushed up the price of oil. It did not follow the path of a speculative bubble, where prices rise in the midst of increasing inventories. The price of oil probably set off the first wave of foreclosures that set off the present economic collapse. A collapse certainly would have come at some point, but not necessarily when it did.

Just about the same time things start to turn up, peak oil will smack us. It will happen again and again. It is not that there will be no oil to buy, we will just be too poor to buy it. Supply and demand will play leapfrog down the hill. The United States is importing 3,000,000 barrels less oil per day than it did in 2007. Oil is still $80 per barrel. We are now too poor to buy more. We will be poorer still.

So, how is this discussion not about peak oil?

Regards,

Coal Guy

A Quaker in a Strange Land said...

Bur:

That's pretty much how I see it, too.

Anonymous said...

Just a note on gardening and diet. Meat and dairy are ok tho they are actually killing a lot of Americans who eat to excess.
But greens, which are easy to grow, that is collards, kale, mustard are excellent sources of large quantities of bioavailable calcium for strong teeth and bones. The greens are available out of the garden every day thru the season.
It is mainly when we decided to have the slaughter feast or king's court banquet every day for breakfast,lunch and dinner with snacks in between that the population has been afflicted with the diseases of wealth.
And if you go without teevee and mall shopping and get a bunch of friends and their kids in to help, 'putting food by' is not that big a deal.

bureaucrat said...

Ready set GO!!! ...

1) In addition to full gas stations and supermarkets, my clean water is still running, the ambulances are still running, and TV stations still broadcast. On the face, the world is just fine.

2) Many of the destroyed lives were of their own making. We can blame the lack of good jobs and the ignorance of people who signed subprime mortages, but ultimately, they destroyed themselves

3) 10 million people lost jobs (so far), not tens of millions

4) There has not been a worldwide shortage (yet) of oil. If you think the oil prices surged upward in 2008 because of lack of oil supply, please explain why the oil price went crashing down just as fast. It was traders that bid up the commodity prices, and when their credit got cut, sold off the oil.

5) We are now swimming in oil products (a couple dozen full oil tankers now sit off the coasts of UK and Singapore), because supply of oil is decreasing, yet demand is decreasing even faster.

6) Peak oil had nothing to do with foreclosures. The first wave of foreclosures was the subprime thing. The next wave, which started last month, is the second group of dumb people who took out Option ARM (interest-only) mortgages, and that nightmare goes thru 2012. The housing supply is about to become swamped with even more empty (soon-to-be-cheaper) houses.

7) We (the U.S.) were consuming 21 million barrels per day (mbpd) of oil, and we are today at 18. We are still consuming a LOT of oil. I only have to look at the Kennedy Expressway to see the cars and trucks burning it all up.

8) You did get one thing spot-on. If I can get away with this Federal retirement at age 57 (I'm 43), with a $3300/month (inflation-adjusted) pension and $3300/month from the (Federal) 401k, you are right. I will be as arrogantly blessed as any white man can be. :) But I haven't seen it materialize just yet.

Love your bonds, carbon. :)

Anonymous said...

Bur,

The ten million only counts the number of people on unemployment. There are also many small businesses that have failed, leaving their proprietors in the same condition as the unemployed. Not to mention the the independent contractors who are kaput. Then there are those on extended unemployment benefits, who don't count in the number either. Plus there are those who gave up looking for work entirely that aren't counted. The government fudges the numbers for its own purposes. Look at income tax receipts in the flat tax states. They are generally down 20% to 30%. There is a good indicator of the real employment picture. That one can't be fudged, and it is bleak.

A large share of the people now losing their homes are those who have had excellent credit but are unemployed and can't and may never find employment at more than 1/3 of their former income. Whose fault is that? Yep, things are just ducky! That is the problem with a credit collapse. It is like an avalanche. Everything in its path is destroyed.

As for those tankers sitting offshore, Those are there due to speculation. Since oil bottomed near $50/bbl, those who know have been stockpiling oil in the expectation that supply will decline. This has pushed higher prices forward since then. But, notice that inventories in the US have begun to fall. Perhaps these guys were right. Perhaps the economy will decline, making demand smaller than the potential the supply of oil. We'll find out. Either way we're screwed.

This thing hasn't even started rolling. Municipal workers are set to be laid off in droves. The medical infrastructure will collapse, as it is becoming disproportionate in size compared to the economy that surrounds it. Same for colleges. The states are broke, and can't fund their share of the federal programs you love. All of these entities have been rolling along on inertia. They are soon to reach the limit as the cash and credit run out.

If either of us has our job in 5 years, I'll be pleasantly surprised. Good Luck! You'll need it and so will I.

Regards,

Coal Guy

bureaucrat said...

A 10% problem does not equal a 50% collapse. :) But we'll see. Tonight me and my credit-impaired friends are using a coupon at IHOP for dinner. The world still turns. (MMMMMMM!! Omellettes!! :))