More than one in seven American households struggled to put enough food on the table in 2008, the highest rate since the Agriculture Department began tracking food security levels in 1995.
That's about 49 million people, or 14.6 percent of U.S. households. The numbers are a significant increase from 2007, when 11.1 percent of U.S. households suffered from what USDA classifies as "food insecurity" — not having enough food for an active, healthy lifestyle.
Researchers blamed the increase in hunger on a lack of money and other resources.
President Barack Obama called the USDA's findings "unsettling." He noted that other indicators of hunger have gone up, such as the number of food stamp applications and the use of food banks. And he said his administration is committed to reversing the trend. "The first task is to restore job growth, which will help relieve the economic pressures that make it difficult for parents to put a square meal on the table each day," Obama said in a statement.
Does anybody else think "jobs" comes first - before food?
---------------------------------------------------
I was thrilled at this piece from a Liberal Blogger apologizing to GWB and family.
We know absolutely no one in Bush family circles and have never met former President George W. Bush or his wife Laura.
If you have been reading us for any length of time, you know that we used to make fun of “Dubya” nearly every day…parroting the same comedic bits we heard in our Democrat circles, where Bush is still, to this day, lampooned as a chimp, a bumbling idiot, and a poor, clumsy public speaker.
Oh, how we RAILED against Bush in 2000…and how we RAILED against the surge in support Bush received post-9/11 when he went to Ground Zero and stood there with his bullhorn in the ruins on that hideous day.
We were convinced that ANYONE who was president would have done what Bush did, and would have set that right tone of leadership in the wake of that disaster. President Gore, President Perot, President Nader, you name it. ANYONE, we assumed, would have filled that role perfectly.
Well, we told you before how much the current president, Dr. Utopia, made us realize just how wrong we were about Bush. We shudder to think what Dr. Utopia would have done post-9/11. He would have not gone there with a bullhorn and struck that right tone. More likely than not, he would have been his usual fey, apologetic self and waxed professorially about how evil America is and how justified Muslims are for attacking us, with a sidebar on how good the attacks were because they would humble us.
Honestly, we don’t think President Gore would have been much better that day. The world needed George W. Bush, his bullhorn, and his indominable spirit that day…and we will forever be grateful to this man for that.
WIll wonders never cease?
6 comments:
The disappearance of Bush from anywhere on TV or in the news cycle is all you need to see that he, like Saddam, won't be missed. Obama inherited a bag of rotten apples that NO man or woman could have addressed totally in 4 or 8 or 12 years or a lifetime. Besides that, if the American empire truly is over (like the Spanish and British empires before it, but that is another story), no one in the White House could have done anything anyway. If anything, Bush just "borrowed" us a few more years. Hooray.
Bur:
Not the point at all.
The point was this guy was a Bush hater, then we get Obama, and now he's a Bush lover. What part did I not get?
Any respect to/of backbone!
Peace
Hey, glad you got the fax from Rush Limpbaugh about these Libruls loving GWB and that you are putting the word out. Dittoheads united.
BTW, do ya think Rush is still doing his broadcasts stoned out of his gourd everyday?
GWB accepts responsibility for his actions and grieves for the casualties. He feels responsible for the deaths of 9/11 because they happened on his watch. He feels responsible for the dead in Texas because their deaths are associated with wars he started. He is a human being.
Does BHO care about American dead? NO! He cares about stroking his own big fat ego and international socialism, a cause to which the USA is a traditional enemy. He could give a rat's @$$.
If he cared about American casualties, he would either give his generals the troops they need to be effective in Afghanistan, or get us out of that pit. Instead, his generals had to "leak" their needs to the press just to get his attention. Still, there is no decision. The death toll is rising and the situation on the ground is deteriorating. This bum is worse than useless.
Regards,
Coal Guy
Post a Comment